NotionCue
AI Visibility Platform
All systems live
Open Dashboard →
AEO GuideCluster Mapllms.txt GeneratorRobots.txt GeneratorBLUF TemplatesBlogChangelogAboutPrivacyTermsContact
Tools

Content Cluster
Map Generator

Enter a pillar topic and get a full hub-and-spoke content map — spokes, articles, internal linking structure, and cannibalization risks. Every page scored for both traditional SEO volume and AI citation potential.

What it is

One pillar.
A web of authority.

A content cluster is a group of related pages built around one core topic — a pillar page that covers the subject broadly, linked to spoke pages that each go deep on a subtopic. Instead of articles competing with each other, you get a connected web search engines and AI engines read as a single source of authority.

A single article earns one ranking. A well-built cluster earns topical authority — exactly what ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini look for when deciding which domain to cite.

PILLARhub page
How it works

One topic in.
A full content map out.

🎯01
Pillar validation
Checks whether the topic has enough fragmented search intent — multiple content types ranking on page one — to justify a full cluster, rather than a single article.
🪢02
Spoke generation
Identifies five distinct subtopics that each deserve their own page, based on semantic relevance to the pillar rather than simple keyword matching.
📄03
Article mapping
Expands every spoke into 5–7 specific article ideas, each with a primary keyword target ready to brief or write.
🔗04
Linking & risk audit
Builds the internal link map between pillar, spokes, and articles, and flags any topics at risk of cannibalising each other's rankings.
Why two scores

Search volume and
citation potential aren't the same thing.

A topic can have high search volume but low AI citation potential — broad commercial terms LLMs rarely quote directly. The reverse is common too: specific how-to content with modest volume that LLMs cite constantly because it answers a question cleanly in the first two sentences.

SEO score

Estimated relative search volume and competitive ranking potential in traditional search results.

Drives → traffic volume
AEO score

Estimated likelihood that AI engines cite or quote this content, based on intent type and how directly the topic answers a specific question.

Drives → AI citation signals
⚠️
Avoiding cannibalization

When two pages target the same intent, engines split authority across both — and neither ranks as well as one consolidated page would. The tool flags overlap automatically and suggests whether to consolidate, differentiate, or restructure before you publish.

🚀
Rolling out in phases

Launch the pillar with your top 3 spokes first, submit to Search Console immediately, then roll out the rest over following weeks. Audit internal links after — an orphaned spoke earns none of the pillar's authority.

The methods

How AI decides
what belongs together.

Traditional clustering groups keywords by shared words — string matching. AI clustering groups by shared meaning. Three methods do the heavy lifting:

Signal-based
SERP-based clustering

Groups keywords by the URLs already ranking for them. If Google consistently surfaces the same pages for two different queries, those queries usually belong in the same cluster — a strong signal, though one to treat as a signal rather than an absolute rule.

What we use
Semantic embedding clustering

Uses the same vector-embedding language models that power ChatGPT and Claude to find deeper conceptual links. It recognises that two topics belong together even when they share zero keywords — reading context, not characters.

Intent-based
Intent clustering

Goes past raw search volume to group keywords by what the searcher actually wants — information, a comparison, or a solution. Keeps the cluster aligned with the full buyer journey instead of over-indexing on whatever has the biggest volume.

The output

A linking map,
built before you write a word.

Every spoke links back to the pillar. The pillar links out to every spoke. Lateral links connect spokes where a reader on one page has obvious reasons to land on another. Mapping this first keeps the cluster coherent as it scales.

Target keyword
Target URL
Parent pillar
Lateral spoke links
Content marketing for SaaS
/content-marketing-saas
all spokes
SaaS content strategy
/saas-content-strategy
/content-marketing-saas
SaaS blog best practices, B2B SaaS SEO
Content marketing ROI for SaaS
/content-marketing-roi-saas
/content-marketing-saas
SaaS content strategy
What AI handles
  • Research and data parsing across hundreds of pages
  • Semantic mapping of pillar, spokes, and articles
  • First-draft outlining and keyword targeting
  • Cannibalization detection across the whole library
What stays yours
  • Editorial direction and which spokes actually ship
  • Original research, data, and real customer examples
  • Business priorities and final publish decisions
  • A point of view a model can't manufacture on its own

The durable approach is hybrid. Neither half is optional.

Measuring it

What to track once
the cluster is live.

Don't obsess over single-keyword wobble. Track the cluster as a group, and set expectations early — organic results are gradual.

📈
Topical authority
Rising average position for the cluster as a whole — not one keyword in isolation.
🧭
Internal link engagement
Whether readers actually move through the pathways you built between pillar and spokes.
4–6 month horizon
Typical time for a new cluster to establish real authority — sometimes longer in competitive niches.
FAQ

Common questions.

How is this different from keyword research tools?
How many spokes and articles should a cluster have?
What is keyword cannibalization and why does it matter?
Should I publish the whole cluster at once?
Does a higher AEO score guarantee an AI citation?
Is this tool free to use?